Reviewers
The reviewers of Revista IDeAS are external to the journal's team, from different institutions and have a doctoral degree in areas within the scope of Revista IDeAS.
Guidelines for Reviewers
- It is the role of the reviewers to interfere directly in the quality of each article submitted;
- Collaborate voluntarily, being aware of the importance of their collaboration with the journal and science;
- Inform editors when they are not comfortable evaluating an article due to the thematic distance from the text in their area of study;
- Carry out a careful reading and with the utmost demands regarding the different evaluation criteria, without giving up the secrecy and respect and cordiality to the authors;
- To pay attention to the quality and representativeness of the title, the effectiveness of the abstract in conveying the essence of the article, the critical correction of the abstract, the adequacy and coherence of the methodology in relation to the objectives of the article, the appropriate analysis of the results, the consequent completion of the work and consistency of the text;
-Inform possible conflicts of interest that may occur when evaluating an article, whether academic, financial, personal or political, and decline from the evaluation;
- Pay attention to the quality of the writing, the objectivity and clarity of the article, the correct use of terms, the representativeness and adequacy of graphics, tables, photos and other figures, and the relevance and updating of references;
- Maintain cordiality with the authors to when making constructive observations regarding the manuscripts;
- Maintain total confidentiality of the tasks you are performing, in addition to ensuring the effectiveness of blind peer evaluation;
- Reviewers are not entitled to use any part of the article they are reviewing.
How is double-blind peer review performed?
The double-blind peer review is fully performed by the Open Journal Systems (OJS), which guarantees the anonymity of the parties involved (authors and peers).
Revista IDeAS has its own form that consists of several questions which must be answered rigorously. The form includes a final text box for comments deemed appropriate and relevant. Revista IDeAS demands that its peers be cordial and make constructive observations about the manuscript. The manuscripts can have one of three judgments made by the peer:
1) accepted (without mandatory changes);
2) accepted with mandatory changes;
3) rejected (with justification).
Do you have doctoral degree and wish to be a reviewer for Revista IDeAS?
Those interested n composing our board of reviewers should send an email to revistaideas@gmail.com with the following information:
Revista IDeAS’ Reviewer:
- Full name:
- Email:
- Institutional Affiliation:
- Link to Curriculum (Lattes for Brazilians or equivalent for foreigners):
- ORCID: (don't you have a registration? Register here).
- Brief history of the biography: covering undergraduate, master's and doctoral degrees and areas of interest (lean text similar to the Lattes curriculum);
- Keywords that can identify your research interest such as food security, land issues, agrarian issues, public policies for rural areas, rural extension methodologies, rural education, gender, indigenous peoples, rural anthropology, environmental conflicts, economic sociology... (don't save keywords; the more, the better for publishers).
In case of approval after analysis by the Editorial Committee, an automatic email will be sent by the OJS system. In case of failure, justification will be presented.
